can the rental of equipment exceede the vaule of the pice of equipment under one contract
Certainly. People are generally free to agree to whatever rental amount they choose (whether it is a good deal for the lessee or lessor) and this holds particularly true in the commercial context.
Relative in Ohio who owns Delano Calif.triplexall vacantcalled to offer me free logging in return for maintaining the grounds labor only and for security purposes broken pipes roof leaks etc Today he called to say he going to sell it and & gave me a 7 day notice. In the 2 yrs living here based on his promise to repay me,I have paid $6,147 on material approved by him for repairs to triplex all labor free and $3924 for his prop tax in Ohio Nothing refunded now he wants to replace 10yr old carpet in my apt before listing & wants to sell cheap & fast ?? Question: Am I entitled to a 60 day notice? Please Help me !
I would say that you are at least a tenant-at-will and as such entitled to a 30-day notice. You could argue that you are a tenant on a month-to month agreement and that you paid rent in the form of the services you provided. As a tenant, you would be entitled to a 60-day notice since you have been there for over a year. You would have to prove that there was an agreement regarding the services between you and the landlord which could be characterized as an agreement to pay rent in that form.
A thirty day notice is required if you are a tenant at will. A tenant at will is someone who occupies the property with the consent of and at the whim of the landlord. This is kind of muddled up because you mention that your occupancy was in exchange for work, which creates a periodic tenancy if the work can be considered rent.
Can Washington DSHS / CPS force myself and my girlfriend to split up?
The caseworker has written an addition to the ISSP that states she needs to sever ties with me completely, or not get her children returned to her. We are not married, have a daughter together, and there are NO disqualifiers in either of our past(s). Due to some documented statements, and a very good paper trail, we know the agency's desire is personally motivated, and has nothing to do with the case, or the welfare of the children.
The issue is strategy. What you want is the kids and the relationship. Until you get the CPS sorted out it would probably be best to not be together. If your information on the social worker is as good as you feel it is, I would separate and focus on that angle.
It sounds like you need an aggressive attorney who will make the CPS follow the law. I don't know any attorneys in the Tri-Cities who fit that description, though there may be some.
I agree with Gary. Assuming you have the documented "goods" on this being a personally motivated case, for now, split up, get the kids back, and then deal with CPS in court. It's never good to sacrifice the kids (meaning keep them in foster care) so you can stay together. The kids come first, no matter how that affects your relationship.
That said, I would only add that you and your girlfriend may ultimately need separate attorneys because your interests may some day pose a conflict for an attorney who represents you both. I suggest that your girlfriend get the first attorney, and if you have funds, for you to retain your own as well. Otherwise, if funds are limited, and the goal is to get and keep the kids home, with you later returning as well, then I'd suggest you devote funds to your girlfriend getting an attorney first.
I need advice for my parent's. There 80yrs old & worked up til last yr.(employer closed)so there only income is SS. & the credit card Co's are killing them. They have a home(with a reverse morgage) & struggle just to pay house exp's. They alway's had great credit & the card co's kept raising there limit's plus % rates. They just can't pay them. My ? is, should I make them file for bankrucy? & what would you suggest? There's no way there able to pay off there credit card's. they have no assets',no pension..
Considering their age and source of income, they are probably what we could call "judgment proof". That is, a creditor could probably get a judgment, but would never be able to collect. On the other hand, a bankruptcy case would stop creditors from harassing them. This is an unfortunate but fairly common situation. Consult an experienced bankruptcy lawyer; do NOT file a bankruptcy case without one because a mistake could have devastating consequences!
Attorney Baker is correct: do NOT file bankruptcy without an experienced bankruptcy lawyer!
That having been said, consultations are free. It is best for the three of you to meet with a bankruptcy attorney who can tell you if bankruptcy is right for them. You can visit Bankruptcy Lawyer in Boston to schedule an appointment.
The sooner you consult, the better. There are usually some preparatory steps to consider before you file, so you should meet asap to get information.
I am a 14 year old male,
I was falsely charged with hitting a towing trailer with my skateboard.
The witnesses called the cops, it took the people an hour to find the dent they supposedly saw me hit. Then there was a 8 or 9 year old brought up saying I told him to F%& off? The whole story is ridiculous, I have court today for it.
I'm on probation for burglury x3 aswell, that happened a year ago. records fine other then that.
"Other then that"? Are you kidding? I guess you meant to ask a question but you did not. All I can say is you better get your life together. At age 17 your 3x burglaries would have ruined you for life.
